Art and Religion in Nepal
by Lydia Aran
Nepali art is a religious art. Its main purpose is not aesthetic but
inspirational. The image is a.mean to realization of a certain state of
consciousness and is not intended to be either a representation of reality or a
pleasurable decoration.
Consequently, the Nepali artist does not endeavor to emulate the external
world or to be true to nature. He paints or sculpts not what he perceives with
his senses but a pictorial metaphor of forces struggling within ourselves. He is
basically communicating a message, or, rather, translating a message inherent in
a certain philosophy or conception of universe into a stereotyped iconographic
idiom. He thus helps people to relate to transcendental forces by having these
forces represented in expressive form real enough to enable even the simplest
people to relate to them, yet sufficiently bizarre to indicate super-human
powers and to command reverence.
Nepali religions are highly syncretistic. Their polytheism is a mean to
accommodate a great variety of beliefs and cults, all acceptable as ways leading
to God, meaning both perfection of consciousness and protection. Their cults,
beliefs and philosophies, which have evolved over thousands of years as
expression of needs, interests and conditions of men, are never dogmatic or
limited to a single doctrine. The boundaries between them are never clearly
demarcated, allowing for pluralistic faiths, eclectic cults and rituals, mutual
borrowing and idiosyncratic preferences in manning personal and local pantheons.
It is therefore no use to approach the Hindu and Buddhist cultures in general,
and their Himalayan variant in particular with the expectation of finding
philosophical and religious creeds, communal or personal rituals, various forms
of creative expression, and identities of deities and other symbols, neatly
compartmentalized and labeled. The two religions and their various schools have
existed next to each other for ages, and, being tolerant and non-exclusive, have
competed with one another not by mutual suppression or destruction but by mutual
accommodation and assimilation. The decisive actors in determining the religious
scene have always been the believers - the simple lay people who kept adopting
each other's gods, symbols, and rituals - simply , because they believed. in
them, and let the scholars rationalize the adoption by endowing the new1y
acquired deities with suitable functions and meanings to make them fit into, the
existing pantheons.. However unsatisfactory this trend might have been for the
guardians of the orthodox Buddhist and Hindu doctrines, it was extremely popular
with the great majority of the Nepali people, who have incorporated these
heterodox beliefs in their worship routines and preserved them in folklore and
art. Many icons combining symbols of different religions and cults can be found
in the Kathmandu Valley, bearing evidence to this tendency. In fact, the most
popular deity of the Valley, the Lord of the World, Lokesvara, is a combination
of the Buddhist Lord of Compassion, Avalokitesvara, with the major Hindu god,
Shiva.
We cannot expect to "'understand" the Hindu or the Buddhist
religions on a superficial acquaintance not only because both have profound
philosophies which must be properly studied to be understood, but above all
because, due to their nature, these religions do not lend themselves to
understanding in purely intellectual terms and have to be lived. or experienced
mentally, emotionally and physically in order to give an idea of their meaning
and message. However, we certainly can enjoy and appreciate the Hindu Buddhist
art and folklore if only we take the trouble to learn the basic things about
their cultural milieu, and, above all, if we can temporarily switch off our
Western conditioning with its watertight division into the sacred and the
profane, its consequent segregation of art, religious worship and the mundane
aspects of living, and its insistence on austerity in religious expression. None
of these conventions are valid in the local cultural-social context. It is
important, moreover, to realize that much of the surviving medieval and early
modern art of Nepal was created. under the inspiration of Tantra, an esoteric
mystic religious trend, whose language in literature and plastic art was
deliberately obscure to keep its secret doctrine from the uninitiated. It was
therefore articulated in a code, in which every smallest iconographic sign,
prescribed in detail in the Tantric scriptures, carried a hidden meaning, the
key to which was held by the initiated alone.
On the other hand, the strange forms of the tantric deities crowding the
temples, shrines and paintings, were - and to a great extent - still are in the
eyes of the majority of the people, portraits of superior but real beings on
whose grace depends their fate, and who are to be supplicated for favor and
protection. They have been given the bizarre and deliberately absurd forms to
express their superhuman nature and their superior power, which they can use to
protect their devotees from evil, but also to, punish them for wrong-doing. We
must remember, therefore, that the gaudy eccentricity and the often weird
extravaganzas of the objects of popular cult are not an indication of ignorance
or ineptitude, but a deliberate appeal to imagination, which - on all levels -
plays a very important part in the Himalayan religious practice. It might be
relevant to mention in this context that some Hindu scriptures describe 'God as
"kavi", a term which also means a poet.

|