Empoisonné à l’AZT! cliquer sur le livre

amazon.com link click here
Poison by Prescription
The Azt Story
by John Lauritsen, Peter Duesberg

Dans ce livre très courageux est révélé un gigantesque scandale dont on n'a pas encore mesuré l'ampleur:

Celui de la mise sur le marché de l’AZT
par la FRAUDE, car Fraude il y a eu.

Phases d'admissions TRUQUEES, en inversant des placebos par exemple!
L’AZT tue les rats sur lesquels il est administré par exemple!
Bref l’azt donne le Sida, car il déprime le système immunitaire, UN COMBLE...
et ... la carcinogènisité de ce médicament doit aussi être pris en compte.
Sans parler des 55000 dollars pour l’obtention de la licence...
Ici, non seulement IL Y A JUNK sciences sans conteste,
mais les docteurs MENGELE de la SS ne sont pas loin de réssusciter...

En fait ce médicament est parfaitement utile pour camoufler les causes de NON nuisance du VIH!

Ainsi les médecins qui prescivent ce médicament ne sont rien d'autre que des criminels, car ils ne peuvent plus en 2004 ignorer ne pas savoir et ne pas avoir lu ce livre de 1990 excusé du temps qui passe...Il est grandement attendu que soit traduit en JUSTICE ces CRIMINELS... de fabricants.. et prescipteurs...


AZT literally killing hundreds of thousands
of unsuspecting victims.

l’AZT pour faire plus discret qu’une chambre à gaz

MBEKI AND THE AIDS DRUG CONTROVERSY

Procès contre GlaxoSmithKline

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PHARMACOLOGY OF AZT AND ITS USE IN AIDS.

The epidemic of AZT and other anti-HIV/AIDS medications.

Can Epidemiology Determine Whether Drugs or HIV Cause AIDS?
(Peter H. Duesberg)

Die tödlichen Gefahren von AZT

This is horrible. My parents are condemned to poison my kids.

Dead Babies: Fauci's AZT African Legacy August 16, 2000


FDA COVER STORY JUST ANOTHER LIE

DECEMBER 6, 2004. Suddenly, the failure of the FDA to get dangerous drugs off the market is being explained by a money trail from drug companies to the FDA.
The story, in a nutshell, goes like this: in 1992, a new arrangement was made, in which drug companies themselves would pay $$ to the FDA to monitor the effects of drugs on the public.
Somehow, this compromise and FDA money shortages within the agency itself have led to overloading in the direction of new-drug approvals and less labor in the direction of detection of adverse drug effects after these approvals.
Like any cover story, there is a degree of truth here. However, the FDA’s problems with allowing dangerous drugs to remain on the market did not begin in 1992.
A whole raft of horrendous cancer chemo drugs was brought into play before ’92. And AZT, in 1986, was launched out of nowhere to treat AIDS. What was not revealed at that time---and is now the subject of a budding lawsuit against AZT’s manufacturer, Glaxo---was that AZT was, in fact, a CHEMOTHERAPY drug.
Why is that important?
Chemo drugs are only given to cancer patients in short bursts, because they are so toxic. Generally, chemo is administered in the hope that it will kill the tumors before it kills the patient, because chemo destroys ALL cells in the body.
However, AZT is given to people with so-called AIDS or so-called positive HIV tests ON AN ONGOING BASIS. NOT in short bursts. AZT is given every day, on and on and on.
That is a crime. That is a capital crime.
In 1986, it didn’t take some genius to do studies of AZT on patients, in order to figure out what was going on. AZT, which had never been approved for human use, after failing to work on rats, was sitting on dusty shelves at the US National Institutes of Health. Had been sitting there since 1961.
Anyone who was aware of its history knew it was, in reality, a chemo drug. To be given to patients every day? DEADLY.
The original study using AZT on humans, done in 1986, was an AIDS study, and the results, which led to its licensing AS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE BY THE FDA, were horrifying, if anyone wanted to look. For example, roughly 20 percent of the people in the study experienced such serious anemias
that they had to receive blood transfusions. And that's just the beginning of what went wrong. John Lauritsen, one of the very best of the AIDS reporters, wrote a book called

POISON BY PRESCRIPTION The Azt Story

. In it, he detailed all the lies and cover-ups surrounding that 1986 study.
No, Virginia, the FDA’s problems with drug safety did not begin in 1992. They began pretty much when the agency was founded. And they've gotten worse ever since.


JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com

A POISONOUS DRUG

SOURCE: nomorefakenews DECEMBER 31, 2003.

In September of 1993, when Bob Guccione, Jr. still published Spin Magazine, he interviewed Dr. Peter Duesberg, the first well-known biologist who rejected HIV as the cause of AIDS.
Duesberg was, as usual, relentless. And dangerous to the AIDS establishment. He had a few things to say about the toxicity of AZT, the primary drug given for AIDS.
There are a few matters on which I would take issue with Duesberg. One is whether or not any scientist has ever isolated HIV at all, has ever found it, has ever discovered it. I would also disagree with his partly positive assessment of the workability of chemotherapy.
But Duesberg makes the action of AZT very clear. The questions below are posed by Guccione.
In San Francisco, there are three people, false positives, who found out now they have no HIV, but were treated with AZT, which is designed to inhibit the virus. And AZT, as we all know is extremely toxic. And they have AIDS now. They have pneumonia, they have pneumocystis-exactly like AIDS-and they have no virus.
You presume it was because of AZT.
That’s what they're suing for.
Explain why you have called AZT "AIDS by prescription."
It’s AIDS by design. It was designed over 20 years ago as a chemotherapy. And chemotherapy is a rational but desperate treatment for cancer. The rationale is, Let's kill all the growing cells for several weeks. The hope is the cancer is going to be totally dead, and you are only half dead and recover. Chemotherapy is a rough treatment. You lose your hair, you lose weight, you get pneumonia, you get immune deficiency, you literally get AIDS, you have nausea, all the AIDS symptoms, because it's severe cellular intoxication. You kill a lot of good cells, too. Often the treatment works, the cancer is indeed dead and you survive and recover.
Now you give that drug to somebody indefinitely. Not just for two or three weeks. Every six hours, your HIV-positive person takes 250 mg of AZT. So they lose weight, they become anemic, they lose their white cells, they have nausea, they lose their muscles. Like Rudolf Nureyev, they cannot even stand on their own legs. And then they die. Like Kimberly Bergalis, Nureyev, Arthur Ashe, Ryan White, and many others. That's what you call AIDS by prescription.
end of interview fragment
"Up to today there is actually no single scientifically really convincing evidence for the existence of HIV. Not even once such a retrovirus has been isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology."
Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology, Max-Planck-Institutes for Biochemy, München.
"If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document."
Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry.


JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com